Hello,
I found the research article ‘Impact of Higher Fidelity Models on Simulation of Active Aerodynamic Load Control For Fatigue Damage Reduction’ by Brian Resor et al. where a comparison between DU_SWAMP and FAST is conducted. You can find the original research article online : [url]http://energy.sandia.gov/wp/wp-content/gallery/uploads/AIAA-2010-253-137-SAND10-0649C.pdf[/url]. I’m particularly interested in the model quasi-steady response to wind input in Figure 3. I have tried regenerated the results using FAST but I keep getting differences. Could you please have a look at my simulation setting?
I’m using wind input files without shear running for 200 minutes long simulations. I’m only using a limited number of DOF but even with all of them I didn’t find the same results. All the inputs and outputs are presented below. Thanks for your time.
The extracted variable names are :
LSShftFxa (thrust (k.N))
TipDxb1 (Flapwise tip dispalcement (m))
RotPwr (Mechanical power (k.W))
RootMyb1 (Flapwise root bending moment (k.N))
Input_Files_For_FAST.txt (27.4 KB)
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
terence.