Dear Dr. jason,
I want to simulate the coupled dynamics of IEA-15MW when a blade suddently break down at a specified spanwise position (say 0.5R) using FAST.
I find this kind of simulations are rarely reported in wind energy communities, and I am trying to use FAST for such simulations with some code customizations.
Now, I have two plans for blade breakup simulation using FAST:
(1) Simplyly set the aerodynamic forces and gravity force to zeros for a certain range of blade span, say 0.5R-1.0R.
(2) Reconstruct the AeroDyn mesh and BeamDyn mesh (or ElastoDyn? ) when the breakup occures.
Could you give me some advice and briefly comment on my two plans whether they correctly representing the real blade breakdown event?
Best regards,
Lin Yang.
Dear @Lin.Yang,
Can you clarify what you mean when you refer to blade break down? Are you referring to cracks appearing in the plies? Or you referring to a complete loss of the portion a blade, where the tip separates from the root?
The former would require a stiffness change (not an aerodynamic change) and the latter would require not just an aerodynamic change, but a change to the mass of the blade.
Best regards,
Dear jason,
Thanks for your quick reply. The blade breakdown i mean is some porpotion of the blade are totally lost, including mass, stiffness,forces…Perhaps I need to prepare two blade files to construct FAST data structures, and switch upon blade break?
best regards.
Lin Yang.

---- Replied Message ----
From | Jason Jonkman via NREL Forumnotifications@nrel.discoursemail.com |
- | - |
Date | 07/10/2025 19:51 |
To | yanglin205@163.com |
Cc | |
Subject | [NREL Forum] [Wind & Water/Structural Analysis] Coupled dynamics simulation using FAST when a blade suddently break down |
| Jason.Jonkman
July 10 |
Dear @Lin.Yang,
Can you clarify what you mean when you refer to blade break down? Are you referring to cracks appearing in the plies? Or you referring to a complete loss of the portion a blade, where the tip separates from the root?
The former would require a stiffness change (not an aerodynamic change) and the latter would require not just an aerodynamic change, but a change to the mass of the blade.
Best regards,
Dear @Lin.Yang,
OpenFAST is not really set up to support a complete loss of a portion of a blade. It would require a source code change to implement.
Best regards,