Hello, everyone,

I encountered a problem, could you please help me check it?

For a three-bladed wind turbine (FAST 1.5MW, Test13) when I increase the density of blade 1 a little bit, the three blades are imbalanced. When I use a constant pitch angle for the three blades, I thought the blade root bending moments for blade 2 and 3 would be the same only with a time delay. But the simulation results showed that the amplitude of blade 3 is a little higher than that of blade 2. I don’t why. Is there anything wrong?

BTW, the generator torque and power are also constant.

Looking forward to your reply. Thanks a lot.

Best regards,

Yunqian Zhang

Sorry, the wind speed is constant (18m/s).

Dear Yunqian,

I agree that if the rotor is balanced (including mass, twist, pitch, stiffness, etc.) then the amplitudes of the loads should be the same if the rotor is operating in constant uniform wind. Can you explain a bit more what you are simulating and how much imbalance you are seeing? Does the imbalance continue after all start-up transients have died out (after the solution becomes periodic due to gravity, shaft tilt, shear, yaw error, etc.)?

Best regards,

Dear Jason,

Sorry for the late feedback. The inputs of the FAST block are all constant, e.g. genetator torque 8.7127e3, power 1.5e6, yaw position and rate 0, blade pitch angel 0.3344.

The waveform is as follows:

Maybe the difference can be negligible.

What I want to do is that under imbalanced condition, using individual pitch control to control the three blade root bending moments constant and equal to each other, so that the tilt and yaw moments can be reduced. The simulation results show that the three blade root bending moments are the same but not constant, they still fluctuate with frequency Ip.

So I used the constant inputs applied to FAST and found this problem.

Thanks again.

Best regards,

Yunqian Zhang

Dear Yunqian,

If I understand what you are asking is why do the blade-root bending moments of blades 2 and 3 differ in Test13 when you make blade 1 heavier, disable control, and simulate in uniform wind. Is that correct?

My guess is that the rotor imbalance you’ve created is leading to a 1P response throughout the system (including the tower) and this response couples with blade 2 sligthly differently than blade 3 based on their azimuth angle. I suspect that if you disable all structural DOFs except for the blade-bending DOFs, that you would see identical response between blades 2 and 3 (time-shifted by 120 degrees).

I hope that helps.

Best regards,

Dear Jason,

Thanks for your reply. I disabled the DOFs, as you said, the bending moments of blade 2 and 3 are identical.

Thanks again!

Best regards,

Yunqian Zhang