Hi Jason,
We’re looking to build a blade display feature of our own, outside of OpenFAST. We’re using the IEA 15MW RWT as a representative test case. We are planning to use the aerofoil profile files to help generate display panels which will stack up to a fully 3D representation of the blade surface.
I have two questions which hopefully you may be able to answer.
- Some of the aerofoil profiles do not appear closed at the trailing edge i.e. there is a sizeable gap between the first and last points in the aerofoil coordinate points. See plot below, created for IEA-15-240-RWT_AF15_Coords.txt. Is there some reason for this? If we were to draw a blade profile based on the coordindates, it would have a flat/blunt side at the trailing edge, and this would look odd I feel.
- In the aerofoil coordinate files, is it safe to assume that the X-Coord, Y-Coord values are always in the following order: trailing edge to leading edge along the lower surface, and then leading edge to trailing edge along the upper surface?
Kind regards,
Aengus