Dear @Meng.He,
Here are my responses:
- Looking at Pietro Bortolotti’s GitHub repository for the BModes model of the IEA Wind 15-MW RWT: IEA15_BModes/RNAon at master · ptrbortolotti/IEA15_BModes · GitHub, I see that his tower top-properties differ from yours, so, how did you obtain your values? Pietro’s model is for a cantilevered tower (
hub_conn
= 1), so, Modes 1 and 2 are the first side-side and fore-aft bending modes shapes and are a reasonable natural frequency (not Modes 6 and 7, which are higher modes). - When calculate the tower mode shapes in BModes for a floating system,
hydro_M
should be the added mass matrix,hydro_K
should be the hydrostatic stiffness weight (accounting both for buoyancy and full-system weight), andmooring_K
should be the mooring system stiffness. - You should be able to interpret the modes by plotting the shapes and by their natural frequencies, assuming that you have a reasonable idea what modes to expect (surge, sway, heave, roll, pitch, yaw, tower-bending, etc.)
sec_loc
,mass_den
,flp_stff
, andedge_stff
in BModes should matchHtFract
,TMassDen
,TwFAStif
, andTwSSStif
in the ElastoDyn tower file. The other values in the BModes tower file (str_tw
, etc.) should be set to to ensure they don’t have an effect on the solution, e.g., as I describe in the following forum topic: Consistency between Bmodes and MBC.
Best regards,